Upon reading the negatively written article (you can read it here), “What’s Wrong With The Hunger Games Is What No One Noticed,” I was disgusted by how much hatred the author of this review has for The Hunger Games. Evidently, The Hunger Games Trilogy is well admired among teens and even older adults. The two Hunger Games movies (soon to be three), have soared in popularity and box office sales. According to http://www.boxofficemojo.com, the second Hunger Games movie, Catching Fire, is ranked #10 in domestic gross in movie history and #1 out of 688 movies for top movie in the last 365 days (beating Frozen!)
Meanwhile, the author of the article I perused was clearly an antagonist of The Hunger Games. I respect people’s opinions on whether they liked a book/movie or not because really, even I don’t believe every book/movie I read or watch is fantastic. Opinions are created because not everyone agrees on the same thing and have divergent tastes. There will never be one book/movie that EVERYONE will love no matter how amazing people think it is. However, there’s a difference between having logical reasoning and just plain ignorant reasoning to back up an opinion.
The author states that Katniss is identical to the princess, Cinderella, and is not a powerful and independent female role model that numerous critics claim she is. “Hmmm, here is a surprise: Katniss never kills anyone. That’s weird, what does she do to win? Take as much time as you want on this, it’s an open book test. The answer is nothing…Other than the initial volunteering to replace her younger sister, Katniss never makes any decisions of her own, never acts with consequence– but her life is constructed to appear that she makes important decisions.” First of all, Katniss does kill four people in the first book; the murderer of Rue, the two when she dropped a wasps nest of them, and Cato for her own advantage. Secondly, Katniss also makes a multitude of decisions throughout the novel such as volunteering for the Games, becoming allies with Rue, staging attacks against other tributes, making a defiant gesture that targeted the Capital after Rue’s demise, and threating to destroy the purpose of the Games by deciding she and Peeta should kill themselves resulting in no winner. Katniss begins to completely rebel against the Capitol in the later books and stands up for what is moral. This woman is definitely one to look up to.
“So this is why we have a book about a post-apocalyptic killing game that spends zero pages describing how Katniss kills anyone but spends countless pages on how she is dressed, how everyone is dressed. What will she wear? What kind of jewelry? Hair up? Will the ‘sponsors’ like her better this way or that? Her chief weapon isn’t a bow, it’s her appearance.”
This excerpt taken from the article is quite invalid. It was not Katniss’s choice to dress up fancifully, but the Capitol’s. The reason why Katniss’s looks and clothes matter so much is because that’s how everyone else in the Capitol is dressed. Katniss doesn’t care for her appearance, it’s only for the entertainment of the Capitol. If it was her choice, she would be wearing her father’s worn out jacket and boots and would not bathe often. She may have an advantage in gaining sponsors and people rooting for her, but once Katniss steps into the arena, there is no one protecting her. She must manage to survive from the other tributes. Katniss’s chief weapon IS a bow. She has been a hunter all her life, and it makes sense for her to use her shooting talent.
Overall, I believe Katniss is nothing like the fairy tale princess, Cinderella. Unlike Cinderella, Katniss doesn’t search for her beloved Prince. She does have her love interests, Gale and Peeta, but the book indicates that the boy isn’t the most essential thing to Katniss. The most important thing that matters to Katniss in life is her family. She teaches young girls to be courageous, strong, and determined. Instead of putting on a girly dress and glass slippers, why not wear jeans, braid you hair, and explore nature? Katniss Everdeen is not like most women in the fiction world; she actually makes an impact in the story. Seriously, did the author of this article even read the book?